0
0
0

Chicago: Please Streamline the Permit Process!

by Chicago Agent

We have heard for years how the city of Chicago is going to streamline the permit process. If this is ever to happen, it would be very good for job creation. As it stands, many investors and developers have to get in line and wait — sometimes six months to over a year to get approval to begin to renovate or build new.  The holding costs are eating at the bottom line and, in many cases, bankrupting many projects.

Greg Viti of Prudential Rubloff.

Often times, these renovations are straightforward. One would think having a great track record and using a qualified architect would help to minimize this lag time — keep dreaming. Some builders now avoid doing projects in the city because of all the fees and hoops one has to jump through. Why are there so many hoops?

I realize that public safety is why we have so many codes and procedures. I am all for safety, but why does so much time have to go by before a project is approved? Not enough trained staff? Perhaps the staff has no urgency?  It is hard not to get a bit cynical when dealing with the permit process in our fine city.

We need the job creation that these projects bring, yet we can’t seem to get them out of City Hall. Technology is here, yet the bureaucracy keeps this process to a snail’s pace. Hopefully the new aldermen and Mayor can figure a way to give businesses a chance to thrive. The current system seems antiquated and frustrating. How can we fix it? Please, new aldermen and Mayor: this is a department that needs immediate attention!

Read More Related to This Post

Comments

  • edward seghers says:

    I would like to know if the process of permits is required for city parks. I want to hold a Boy Scouts group outing at either the Lake Michigan lake front park or one of the Forrest Preserve. Please get back to me as soon as possible I can schedule my venters and etc.

    Thank you,

    Edward Seghers

Join the conversation

New Subscribe

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.