REach Program: A New Revenue Stream for NAR or a Powerful Start-up Incubator?

by Chicago Agent

NAR’s REach program still has some asking questions.

By Lani Rosales, AGBeat

This month, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) REach, the new real estate technology incubator which seeks companies at all stages of growth, noted that the accelerator program “will be particularly useful to those just now turning a focus to the real estate ecosystem.”

The nine-month program, which will accept six to 10 companies per year, is accepting applications through Jan. 10, 2013, and begins in March.

NAR emphasizes that “while other Accelerator programs provide some similar functions and many significant benefits, REach’s differentiating factor is a focus on education, mentorship and market exposure around access to the trillion-dollar real estate market and the strategic expertise NAR can bring. In the process, NAR will also bring added value to its membership and continue to fulfill its core mission by identifying those technologies, resources and companies that will most benefit the industry.”

The Program’s Marketing Fees

According to the REach website, “participants will be responsible for providing a nominal marketing fee and small percentage of common stock. Contact us for more details.” We asked for clarification from Constance Freedman, founder and managing director at REach, managing director of Second Century Ventures and vice president of strategic investments for NAR. “We are asking that companies reach out to us for details so we can best communicate the value for both sides and answer any questions accordingly,” Freedman said.
When asked for a ballpark figure, Freedman said, “The program is set up so that all parties are aligned. For any further details please just direct questions back to us. I’m not trying to evade the question but purposefully not publishing fees so that we can have a discussion with all qualified applicants to ensure cost/benefits are communicated clearly.”

Outline: The Value of the Program

Freedman explained the fees in terms of advertising dollars. “The cost is less than what we estimate [for a vendor to have a booth] to go to one show, and the value is equivalent to going to two shows – NAR Annual and NAR Midyear – and we are including them in offline as well as online ads for exposure on various channels. We offer access to 150 mentors and 500 beta testers.” Additionally, they help locate other investors and help startups with their pitch decks.

“This program puts the $4.5 billion NAR brand behind [the participants], the most powerful force in the industry, as well as gives access to mentors that are entrepreneurs and CEOs within the industry, collecting $1 billion in revenue in real estate alone. Also, participants get exposure to potentially 12 million customers, 1 million of which are Realtors.”

Freedman says this program is different than traditional incubators. “It is opening up a market, and we work with the startups to pull out all the stops in that market, it’s a strategic play. It is a longer program than traditional incubators, allowing for real market penetration, whereas traditional incubators’ end game is different, focusing on the value of the company,” and less on market penetration.

How the Marketing Fees Work

When do applicants have to contribute their marketing fees, and is it negotiable? Can they opt out of the NAR Expo? Is it based on their current stage and funding status, or is it flat fee? Freedman told AG the fees are non-negotiable, and are a flat fee, due up front.

“After several months of research prior to launching REach, we are confident that fees will not be a barrier to entry for qualified companies,” Freedman said. “There is no opting in and out of things, and we’ve built a program that we believe can provide the best opportunities for companies to accelerate their potential growth in this market. The fees are not meant to be a money making element of the program – they are going towards promoting the companies and providing further exposure for them to the market place. The equity component aligns our interests long term.

Ultimately, the value the companies will receive should far surpass the fees charged from the program; we will have conversations with all qualified applicants to help them assess whether that is the case for them – we only want to work with companies where we have a mutual belief that this is true.”

So, Why No Transparency?

“It is not a figure made public because we want to be able to have a conversation with these companies, and avoiding the gut reaction they may have in response,” Freedman said. “We would much rather have them direct questions to us in order to make a more informed decision. We don’t want to turn people away.”

REach does not offer up front investment in the companies participating in the accelerator program, but Freedman said that “the goal is to graduate them into Second Century Ventures [NAR’s investment arm].”

CEO of NAR Dale Stinton said, “I think we could better describe it as a program participation fee which is calculated to cover our costs, including marketing, our time and our administrative expenses.”

Another part of the program that many have asked us about is the fact that the incubator will not sign a non-disclosure agreement (NDA), nor a non-compete. Some criticize this, but it is actually normal not only for accelerator programs to not sign these documents, but angel investors, venture capitalists and other programs don’t either.

“…a way for NAR to monetize its cabal”

Jeremy Bencken, a mentor at the Capital Factory accelerator program and founder of Wordloop, said that charging early stage companies is “out of step with the times.”

“Most accelerators invest a mix of cash and intangible services into their accepted companies,” he said. “I don’t know of any respected ones that charge a fee. Capital Factory invests $20,000 in the companies we accept, along with free office space, legal, PR, design and access to the advice and networks of our mentors.”

“If history is any guide,” Bencken said, “a fee merely limits you to startups without better options. If your goal is to build a portfolio of sustainable, high-quality companies, hitting startups with fees is a major impediment to that, and historically, is a failed business model. For example, in the bad old days, the DEMO conference charged startups to launch at their show. In 2006, I was invited to launch TenantMarket.com at DEMO, but we declined when we discovered the fee was $20,000. TechCrunch Disrupt and LAUNCH were founded specifically to destroy that business model. And they did. Today, the best startups have their choice of free launch conferences.”

Market Decides If Charging Startups Necessary

Which brings us to today. “Many angel networks used to charge startups application fees up to $1,000 simply to apply to pitch. Today, the best companies and angel investors connect primarily via AngelList, and most angel groups have abandoned their application fees,” Bencken said. “Ultimately, the market will decide if charging startups is a good idea, but given that there are only three to four billion-dollar companies founded each year, as an investor, you’re better off by opening your doors as wide as possible to ensure that you get a shot at them.”

“More like a marketing partnership than an incubator”

Jonathan Eyler-Werve, VP of Technology at MoxieJean.com which helps busy mothers reuse baby and childrens’ clothes, simply said, “this smells badly.”

Having recently graduated an accelerator program, Eyler-Werve said, “There are a lot of accelerators firing up right now, with no corresponding scale up of VC or angel funding, no sudden increase in the pool of qualified people willing to mentor. So there is a boom bust cycle to this. If I were signing, I would ask some hard questions of any accelerator. Questions about tone, about their track record, and of course about money.”

Regarding the REach program, he noted the program sounds “more like a marketing partnership than an incubator. “This place wants cash – which investors should be providing, not taking – committed to a marketing buy that may not have anything to do with the business model you commit to? If you have a product and marketing strategy locked in, what is the value add exactly?”

“It does not sound like an incubator to me”

ReachFactor CEO, Suresh Srinivasan has created numerous startups over 15 years, and has been an angel investor in tech startups for the last five. “I’ve never heard of the typical incubator asking for cash or marketing commitments up front,” he said. “Usually they put (very little) money into the company being incubated in exchange for early equity on merits of the idea & the founders’ willingness to grind it out. I can’t imagine how much cash is lying around an idea-stage company, but those booths at NAR are pricey!”

Srinivasan adds that the fees could be a way of vetting the field. Because they don’t put money into the company, he opines that “it sounds more like they offer the promise of guidance & access to the market. Asking for financial commitments from participants probably helps them vet the field a little and prevent a flood of applicants who’re not 150percent committed.”

Under the current model of the accelerator, he says it is “more like a brand’s preferred alliance program with a dash of mentoring and advice to boot. It does not sound like an incubator to me.”

Incubator Brings the Most Valuable Assets Possible to Bear

Simon Justice Hall, Realtor and Branding/Multimedia Consultant at AustinCondoMania said that exposure, market penetration, mentorship, and beta users that are offered are “the most significant ways to support a budding company in the real estate business.”

Hall added, “Fortunately, unlike the restaurant business, you don’t need $100k in restaurant equipment and a physical location to start cooking grandma’s recipes in real estate. I would consider mentorship the most valuable contribution in the arsenal.”

Tina Cannon is a Partner at Napkin Venture, Co-founder of PetsMD.com, and Entrepreneur-in-Residence at Texas State University, recently co-founding PreAccelerate, a pre-seed stage startup bootcamp.

Cannon said, “I cannot recall ever seeing “fees” as part of the requirement to be in an incubator, those are more program styled groups and should not call themselves incubators. If they want to charge fees, then have a class or specific marketing program to assist the industry.”

“It has been my experience that those involved in incubators like myself, do it because we are passionate about entrepreneurs,” Cannon added. “We are not in it for money and the vast majority of the time, we never see any money! We do it because it is the right thing to do for the entrepreneur ecosystem. The hope is that over the years of incubated companies, that one might actually rise to the top and if not, then we are still satisfied with what we have all done to impact entrepreneurs.”


Read More Related to This Post

Join the conversation

New Subscribe

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.