0
0
0

Raising the Rate:  New Ways Agents are Getting Higher Commissions 

by Liz Ganshirt

À La Carte

Michael Berg of Berg Properties, Inc. in Oak Park operates his business with à la carte offerings. Similar to a menu, and LaFido’s commission structure, Berg prices out what he can do to sell a client’s home, what those expenses will cost him out of pocket, and what he should charge to make a return on investment.

“We work with a lot of do-it-yourself types, investors and builders,” he says. “We provide an MLS listing for $295 and we have other services, like putting up yard signs and other marketing options. We do offer some help on pricing and send out CMAs. If it doesn’t work with us or they’re unhappy with my group’s services, we refer them to a top-selling agent in their area. If they sign with that agent, they get their money back from us.”

Berg Properties provides an entrance point for clients who don’t feel that they can afford traditional services. He focuses on short sale clients, but does provide traditional services for clients that want more attention. While his group works very hard to ensure excellent service – an assertion backed up by glowing online reviews – he gives all clients the choice for what they get when hiring him.

“Some people question the validity (of this commission model), but why wouldn’t I treat you the same and offer the same services, even if the home isn’t within a certain price point?” Berg says. “I dont think people should be treated differently when buying or selling in certain price points. Is that realistic? No – a lot of brokerages have minimums they charge. But because of that, I like to give clients a choice of what they want me to do for them, and show them what my commission will be depending on what they choose.”

Flat fee listing providers should be carefully researched before referring to a client who is underwater on their house or otherwise paralyzed by the prospect of committing to a commission. Another important thing to remind clients who are considering the prospect of flat fee listing is that all the legalities will be on their own shoulders. This topic comes up repeatedly on discussion boards and shouldn’t be taken lightly.

Whatever fee structure an agent chooses, they should focus on delivering what they’ve promised. That will lead to referral-based prospects, which are much less costly than those gained through advertising. Also, those prospects are more likely to turn into clients. There are lots of structures for listing agreements; it can be easy to get distracted by the latest trend, the new fee. But brokers who do the best choose a fee that they feel is appropriate, stand by it with confidence and do their best to serve up what they promise – all the way to closing time. CA 

Screen shot 2014-07-24 at 9.03.34 AM

Read More Related to This Post

Comments

  • Gary Lucido says:

    I looked up the history on that Mokena listing. They originally priced it at $1.175 MM back in 2008 and then $850K in 2010/ 2011. So no great miracle that the house ultimately sold when listed for $795K. Now, granted, it was listed in late 2012 at $800K but the market is much stronger now. I just don’t believe that the agent makes that much difference unless you are comparing to those agents that are unresponsive and use crappy photos.

    Another issue I have is the belief that a higher co-op makes a difference. If it is true then those buyer agents aren’t acting in the best interests of their clients are they?

  • Mike LaFido says:

    Gary, I can appreciate your response “Does a higher co-op make a difference?” It’s been my experience it does (from both research and experience on the listing side). The flip side of the coin (offering 2% or less to buyers broker) has a negative impact (from both research and experience on the listing side) on both the days on market and the list/sale %.
    As far as the marketing being much stronger…that is such a general statement. The market in Mokena for 750k plus homes is worse than last year. Feel free to check out the data from Info Sparks. This particular homes
    11.3 months of inventory. 7+ is a buyers market (up from 9.2 last year)
    Homes are selling for 91.7% of original asking price (down 95.4% last year).

  • Anthony says:

    Great feed back Mike! I looked into both, and I too agree that you need to have full research to make an opinion. Thanks!

  • Gary Lucido says:

    So all those buyer’s agents that are being influenced by higher or lower co-op commissions are doing a disservice to their clients by steering them to properties that will make them more money. Right?

  • Earl Ruthman says:

    I believe almost 100% of realtors will do what is best for their clients (seller and buyers). The only issue i have when i am looking at the coop commission if it is notably low is that it may indicate dealing with a difficult person (seller or agent). But that being said wouldn’t impact showing or making an offer on that property.

Join the conversation

New Subscribe

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.