0
0
0

Michigan agents sue NAR, claim membership requirement to access MLS violates federal law

by Patrick Regan

Three Michigan real estate agents filed a class-action lawsuit this week against the National Association of REALTORS® (NAR), claiming the membership requirement to access the MLS is a violation of federal law.  

The suit, filed by three agents from Southeast Michigan, also names several local associations in the state.  

The suit alleges that requiring membership in NAR, plus the Michigan Association of REALTORS® and a local association, in order to access the MLS is “akin to mandating membership in a union or other trade organization, depriving members of free choice.”   

The suit comes just before new rules stemming from NAR’s lawsuit settlement take effect, which will eliminate commissions from the MLS and require written buyer’s agents agreements.  

The lawsuit filed this week alleges that NAR’s settlement eliminated “the guaranteed broker commission.” The plaintiffs also took issue with NAR annual fees, calling them “significant.”

Do you agree with the plaintiffs’ claims? Let us know your thoughts by emailing patrick.regan@agentpublishing.com. Your responses may be part of a future article in Chicago Agent.  

Read More Related to This Post

Comments

  • Jill Lusk says:

    Absolutely agree! I am a realtor and I support them 100% in this lawsuit. NAR mandates what realtors can do. Zero options! NAR is useless to the average realtor yet we are forced to belong or we can’t be a realtor.

  • Michael Knight says:

    GOOD JOB! Such a stupid decision for rules that were ALREADY DEFINED and UNDERSTOOD. However, seeing that we live in a world where a person with broad shoulders a beard mustache and deep growling voice has the legal right to FORCE YOU to call them a hippopotamus out of respect for their FEELINGS just shows however it is truly not what is TRUE, it is what you can make a juror BELIEVE (Law Abiding Citizen movie quote)

Join the conversation

New Subscribe

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.